TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR292

R292Reproduced evidence

Fibonacci growth rate does not force the determinant property

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

The recurrence sequence 2,6,8,14,22,36,58 has Fibonacci growth and gives determinant 2 at n=5.

The recorded result has been reproduced within its stated scope.

Recorded status: established

Recorded scope: the sequence 2,6,8,14,22,36,58 at n = 5

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "bounded",
  "statement": "the sequence 2,6,8,14,22,36,58 at n = 5",
  "bounds": {
    "n": {
      "min": 5,
      "max": 5
    }
  },
  "exhaustive": true
}

Originating problem: Determinants of the Fibonacci-sum matrix

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Fibonacci growth rate does not force the determinant property
Record type
claim
Stored status
established
Evidence grade
reproduced
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "bounded", "statement": "the sequence 2,6,8,14,22,36,58 at n = 5", "bounds": { "n": { "min": 5, "max": 5 } }, "exhaustive": true }

2Authored explanation

A classification must use arithmetic placement or recurrence initial conditions rather than asymptotic growth alone.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, comment lines 147-154 and research/fibonacci/checks.py

4How it connects

Constrains

Evidenced by

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R292",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "fib-claim-growth-insufficient-scoped",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Fibonacci growth rate does not force the determinant property",
  "summary": "The recurrence sequence 2,6,8,14,22,36,58 has Fibonacci growth and gives determinant 2 at n=5.",
  "relevance": "For fib problem determinant range; fib problem nonzero support, record fib-claim-growth-insufficient-scoped (“Fibonacci growth rate does not force the determinant property”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: The recurrence sequence 2,6,8,14,22,36,58 has Fibonacci growth and gives determinant 2 at n=5.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "A classification must use arithmetic placement or recurrence initial conditions rather than asymptotic growth alone.",
  "status": "established",
  "evidence_grade": "reproduced",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "bounded",
    "statement": "the sequence 2,6,8,14,22,36,58 at n = 5",
    "bounds": {
      "n": {
        "min": 5,
        "max": 5
      }
    },
    "exhaustive": true
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/513340/is-the-determinant-of-this-fibonacci-sum-indicator-matrix-always-1-0-or/513372",
      "locator": "comment lines 147-154 and research/fibonacci/checks.py"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/513340/is-the-determinant-of-this-fibonacci-sum-indicator-matrix-always-1-0-or/513372",
    "locator": "comment lines 147-154 and research/fibonacci/checks.py"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R274",
      "title": "Classify sequences with totally unimodular sum matrices",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "constrains",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R265",
      "title": "Exact growth-rate counterexample at n=5",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R291",
      "title": "Fibonacci growth rate does not force the determinant property",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "supersedes",
      "direction": "outgoing",
      "metadata": {
        "reason": "This revision records the reviewed scope explicitly."
      }
    }
  ]
}

6Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.