Problem packetResearch packetR291
Fibonacci growth rate does not force the determinant property
Link to a section
The recorded result has been reproduced within its stated scope.
Recorded status: established
Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.
Originating problem: Determinants of the Fibonacci-sum matrix
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Fibonacci growth rate does not force the determinant property
- Record type
- claim
- Stored status
- established
- Evidence grade
- reproduced
2Authored explanation
A classification must use arithmetic placement or recurrence initial conditions rather than asymptotic growth alone.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, comment lines 147-154 and research/fibonacci/checks.py
4How it connects
Constrains
- attempt
Evidenced by
- artifact
Replaced by
- claim
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R291",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "fib-claim-growth-insufficient",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Fibonacci growth rate does not force the determinant property",
"summary": "The recurrence sequence 2,6,8,14,22,36,58 has Fibonacci growth and gives determinant 2 at n=5.",
"relevance": "For fib problem determinant range; fib problem nonzero support, record fib-claim-growth-insufficient (“Fibonacci growth rate does not force the determinant property”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: The recurrence sequence 2,6,8,14,22,36,58 has Fibonacci growth and gives determinant 2 at n=5.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "A classification must use arithmetic placement or recurrence initial conditions rather than asymptotic growth alone.",
"status": "established",
"evidence_grade": "reproduced",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/513340/is-the-determinant-of-this-fibonacci-sum-indicator-matrix-always-1-0-or/513372",
"locator": "comment lines 147-154 and research/fibonacci/checks.py"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/513340/is-the-determinant-of-this-fibonacci-sum-indicator-matrix-always-1-0-or/513372",
"locator": "comment lines 147-154 and research/fibonacci/checks.py"
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R274",
"title": "Classify sequences with totally unimodular sum matrices",
"object_type": "attempt",
"relation": "constrains",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "R264",
"title": "Exact growth-rate counterexample at n=5",
"object_type": "artifact",
"relation": "evidences",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R292",
"title": "Fibonacci growth rate does not force the determinant property",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "supersedes",
"direction": "incoming",
"metadata": {
"reason": "This revision records the reviewed scope explicitly."
}
}
]
}6Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.