TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR781

R781Evidence unclassified

Global optimality for fifteen points remains open

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

With \(\alpha\) the isolated root near \(0.5926059029250737\) of \(13x^5-x^4+6x^3+2x^2-3x-1\), the checked bounds are \(\arccos(\alpha)\le\theta_{15}\le2\arccos(13/15)\), or \(53.65785012993268\ldots^\circ\) through \(59.85286973322849\ldots^\circ\); global optimality of the lower construction remains open.

The recorded evidence grade has no defined assessment here.

Recorded status: open

Recorded scope: the global Tammes optimum for exactly 15 points on S^2

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "bounded",
  "statement": "the global Tammes optimum for exactly 15 points on S^2",
  "bounds": {
    "points": {
      "min": 15,
      "max": 15
    }
  },
  "exhaustive": false
}

Originating problem: Tammes separation for fifteen points on the sphere

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Global optimality for fifteen points remains open
Record type
claim
Stored status
open
Evidence grade
literature_audit
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "bounded", "statement": "the global Tammes optimum for exactly 15 points on S^2", "bounds": { "points": { "min": 15, "max": 15 } }, "exhaustive": false }

2Authored explanation

The current spherical-code table marks proved optima with an asterisk. Its 15-point row has no asterisk. Kottwitz's primary paper describes its solutions for 15 through 90 circles as conjectured solutions. Musin and Tarasov later proved the 14-point case by enumerating irreducible contact graphs, and their proof makes no claim for 15 points.

The strongest construction checked here and the elementary cap-area bound give \[ \arccos(\alpha)\leq\theta_{15}\leq2\arccos(13/15), \] or numerically \[ 53.65785012993268\ldots^\circ \leq\theta_{15}\leq 59.85286973322849\ldots^\circ. \] For the upper bound, place disjoint caps of angular radius \(\theta_{15}/2\) around the points. Each cap has area \(2\pi(1-\cos(\theta_{15}/2))\). Their total area is at most \(4\pi\), so \(15(1-\cos(\theta_{15}/2))\leq2\).

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: doi.org ↗, D. A. Kottwitz, The densest packing of equal circles on a sphere, Acta Crystallographica A 47 (1991), 158-165. The abstract calls the reported solutions conjectured. See also O. R. Musin and A. S. Tarasov, The Tammes problem for N=14, Experimental Mathematics 24 (2015), 460-468, arXiv:1410.2536.

4What was measured

5How it connects

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R781",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "tfs-claim-open-interval",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Global optimality for fifteen points remains open",
  "summary": "With \\(\\alpha\\) the isolated root near \\(0.5926059029250737\\) of \\(13x^5-x^4+6x^3+2x^2-3x-1\\), the checked bounds are \\(\\arccos(\\alpha)\\le\\theta_{15}\\le2\\arccos(13/15)\\), or \\(53.65785012993268\\ldots^\\circ\\) through \\(59.85286973322849\\ldots^\\circ\\); global optimality of the lower construction remains open.",
  "relevance": "For Tammes separation for fifteen points on the sphere, record tfs-claim-open-interval (“Global optimality for fifteen points remains open”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: With \\(\\alpha\\) the isolated root near \\(0.5926059029250737\\) of \\(13x^5-x^4+6x^3+2x^2-3x-1\\), the checked bounds are \\(\\arccos(\\alpha)\\le\\theta_{15}\\le2\\arccos(13/15)\\), or \\(53.65785012993268\\ldots^\\circ\\) through \\(59.85286973322849\\ldots^\\circ\\); global optimality of the lower construction remains open.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The current spherical-code table marks proved optima with an asterisk. Its 15-point row has no asterisk. Kottwitz's primary paper describes its solutions for 15 through 90 circles as conjectured solutions. Musin and Tarasov later proved the 14-point case by enumerating irreducible contact graphs, and their proof makes no claim for 15 points.\n\nThe strongest construction checked here and the elementary cap-area bound give\n\\[\n\\arccos(\\alpha)\\leq\\theta_{15}\\leq2\\arccos(13/15),\n\\]\nor numerically\n\\[\n53.65785012993268\\ldots^\\circ\n\\leq\\theta_{15}\\leq\n59.85286973322849\\ldots^\\circ.\n\\]\nFor the upper bound, place disjoint caps of angular radius \\(\\theta_{15}/2\\) around the points. Each cap has area \\(2\\pi(1-\\cos(\\theta_{15}/2))\\). Their total area is at most \\(4\\pi\\), so \\(15(1-\\cos(\\theta_{15}/2))\\leq2\\).",
  "status": "open",
  "evidence_grade": "literature_audit",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "bounded",
    "statement": "the global Tammes optimum for exactly 15 points on S^2",
    "bounds": {
      "points": {
        "min": 15,
        "max": 15
      }
    },
    "exhaustive": false
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767390011370",
      "locator": "D. A. Kottwitz, The densest packing of equal circles on a sphere, Acta Crystallographica A 47 (1991), 158-165. The abstract calls the reported solutions conjectured. See also O. R. Musin and A. S. Tarasov, The Tammes problem for N=14, Experimental Mathematics 24 (2015), 460-468, arXiv:1410.2536."
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767390011370",
    "locator": "D. A. Kottwitz, The densest packing of equal circles on a sphere, Acta Crystallographica A 47 (1991), 158-165. The abstract calls the reported solutions conjectured. See also O. R. Musin and A. S. Tarasov, The Tammes problem for N=14, Experimental Mathematics 24 (2015), 460-468, arXiv:1410.2536."
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R780",
      "title": "The best published construction has an exact algebraic separation",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "bounds",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "tammes-fifteen-separation",
      "title": "tammes fifteen separation",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.