TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR1770

R1770Sourced evidence

Current status and exact unresolved remainder

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

OPEN as checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked neighboring result: Improved algorithms exist for every fixed k, and circuit lower bounds or restricted-model SAT lower bounds give partial evidence. Exact unresolved remainder: The unrestricted quantified lower bound remains unproved and undisproved.

The record cites sources for its explanation.

Recorded status: reported

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Current status and exact unresolved remainder
Record type
claim
Stored status
reported
Evidence grade
sourced

2Authored explanation

The problem was checked as open on 2026-08-01.

The strongest neighboring result found in the cited sources is: Improved algorithms exist for every fixed k, and circuit lower bounds or restricted-model SAT lower bounds give partial evidence.

The exact unresolved remainder is: The unrestricted quantified lower bound remains unproved and undisproved.

A complete resolution must meet the following acceptance conditions: - Prove the quantified lower bound in a standard deterministic machine model. - Or give one ε>0 and algorithms solving k-SAT in O((2−ε)^n) for every k.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: doi.org ↗, R. Impagliazzo and R. Paturi, On the complexity of k-SAT, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 62 (2001). definition and consequences

4What was measured

5How it connects

Informed by

Evidenced by

Addressed by

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R1770",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "strong-exponential-time-hypothesis-claim-status-20260801",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Current status and exact unresolved remainder",
  "summary": "OPEN as checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked neighboring result: Improved algorithms exist for every fixed k, and circuit lower bounds or restricted-model SAT lower bounds give partial evidence. Exact unresolved remainder: The unrestricted quantified lower bound remains unproved and undisproved.",
  "relevance": "This is the dated publication status for the canonical target Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The problem was checked as open on 2026-08-01.\n\nThe strongest neighboring result found in the cited sources is: Improved algorithms exist for every fixed k, and circuit lower bounds or restricted-model SAT lower bounds give partial evidence.\n\nThe exact unresolved remainder is: The unrestricted quantified lower bound remains unproved and undisproved.\n\nA complete resolution must meet the following acceptance conditions:\n- Prove the quantified lower bound in a standard deterministic machine model.\n- Or give one ε>0 and algorithms solving k-SAT in O((2−ε)^n) for every k.",
  "status": "reported",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.2000.1727",
      "locator": "R. Impagliazzo and R. Paturi, On the complexity of k-SAT, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 62 (2001). definition and consequences"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.2000.1727",
    "locator": "R. Impagliazzo and R. Paturi, On the complexity of k-SAT, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 62 (2001). definition and consequences"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R1769",
      "title": "Strongest checked neighboring result",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R1767",
      "title": "Dated source and duplicate audit",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R1768",
      "title": "Work at the unresolved boundary",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "addresses",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "strong-exponential-time-hypothesis",
      "title": "strong exponential time hypothesis",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.