TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR1767

R1767Recorded attempt

Dated source and duplicate audit

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: Improved algorithms exist for every fixed k, and circuit lower bounds or restricted-model SAT lower bounds give partial evidence. Unresolved remainder: The unrestricted quantified lower bound remains unproved and undisproved.

The record cites sources for its explanation. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.

Attempt outcome: completed

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis

Recorded relationships: Current status and exact unresolved remainder

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Dated source and duplicate audit
Record type
attempt
Stored status
completed
Evidence grade
sourced
Linked research record IDs
R1770

Work and source credit

Recorded action

No action description supplied.

Authored result summary
Read complete authored result summary

The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: Improved algorithms exist for every fixed k, and circuit lower bounds or restricted-model SAT lower bounds give partial evidence. Unresolved remainder: The unrestricted quantified lower bound remains unproved and undisproved.

Reported outcome

No separate outcome supplied.

Recorded status

completed

Recorded evidence grade

sourced

Recorded scope

No explicit scope supplied.

This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.

Recognized embedded source files (0)

This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.

The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.

2Authored explanation

The audit ran on 2026-08-01 across the cited primary literature and problem collections, Crossref, arXiv, and stable publisher records, TheoremDB published, prospecting, packet, formal, and retired corpus. It checked the exact statement, its named or normalized variants, recent status evidence, and the controlled TheoremDB corpus.

Queries included: - Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis open 2026 - SETH k-SAT base 2 current algorithms

The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: Improved algorithms exist for every fixed k, and circuit lower bounds or restricted-model SAT lower bounds give partial evidence. Unresolved remainder: The unrestricted quantified lower bound remains unproved and undisproved.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Outcome

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: doi.org ↗, R. Impagliazzo and R. Paturi, On the complexity of k-SAT, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 62 (2001). definition and consequences

4How it connects

Evidence for

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R1767",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "strong-exponential-time-hypothesis-attempt-dated-source-audit",
  "type": "attempt",
  "title": "Dated source and duplicate audit",
  "summary": "The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: Improved algorithms exist for every fixed k, and circuit lower bounds or restricted-model SAT lower bounds give partial evidence. Unresolved remainder: The unrestricted quantified lower bound remains unproved and undisproved.",
  "relevance": "Documents why Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis was treated as a distinct open target on 2026-08-01.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The audit ran on 2026-08-01 across the cited primary literature and problem collections, Crossref, arXiv, and stable publisher records, TheoremDB published, prospecting, packet, formal, and retired corpus. It checked the exact statement, its named or normalized variants, recent status evidence, and the controlled TheoremDB corpus.\n\nQueries included:\n- Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis open 2026\n- SETH k-SAT base 2 current algorithms\n\nThe exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: Improved algorithms exist for every fixed k, and circuit lower bounds or restricted-model SAT lower bounds give partial evidence. Unresolved remainder: The unrestricted quantified lower bound remains unproved and undisproved.",
  "status": "completed",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "attempt",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.2000.1727",
      "locator": "R. Impagliazzo and R. Paturi, On the complexity of k-SAT, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 62 (2001). definition and consequences"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.2000.1727",
    "locator": "R. Impagliazzo and R. Paturi, On the complexity of k-SAT, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 62 (2001). definition and consequences"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R1770",
      "title": "Current status and exact unresolved remainder",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "strong-exponential-time-hypothesis",
      "title": "strong exponential time hypothesis",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

6Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.