Problem packetResearch packetR1716
Dated status and exact unresolved remainder
Link to a section
The record cites sources for its explanation.
Recorded status: reported
Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.
Originating problem: Consistency strength of projective Ramsey regularity
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Dated status and exact unresolved remainder
- Record type
- claim
- Stored status
- reported
- Evidence grade
- sourced
2Authored explanation
The packet's cited sources and equivalent formulations were checked in the dated review recorded below.
Strongest checked result: The MathOverflow answers give upper and lower consistency bounds and say the exact strength is open. Later checked problem lists continue to ask for the missing comparison, but the audit did not locate a definitive current survey.
Exact unresolved remainder: Prove both relative-consistency directions between \(\mathsf{ZFC}\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, Full question, answers, and visible comments concerning Consistency strength of projective Ramsey regularity; checked 2026-08-01.
4What was measured
5How it connects
Replaces
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1716",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "projective-sets-ramsey-consistency-strength-status-packet-quality-20260801",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Dated status and exact unresolved remainder",
"summary": "Unresolved in this packet after the dated source check. Strongest checked result: The MathOverflow answers give upper and lower consistency bounds and say the exact strength is open. Later checked problem lists continue to ask for the missing comparison, but the audit did not locate a definitive current survey. Exact unresolved remainder: Prove both relative-consistency directions between \\(\\mathsf{ZFC}\\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration.",
"relevance": "For Consistency strength of projective Ramsey regularity, this successor gives readable dated status prose and the exact remaining research boundary.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "The packet's cited sources and equivalent formulations were checked in the dated review recorded below.\n\nStrongest checked result: The MathOverflow answers give upper and lower consistency bounds and say the exact strength is open. Later checked problem lists continue to ask for the missing comparison, but the audit did not locate a definitive current survey.\n\nExact unresolved remainder: Prove both relative-consistency directions between \\(\\mathsf{ZFC}\\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration.",
"status": "reported",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/76280/exact-consistency-strength-of-all-projective-sets-are-ramsey",
"locator": "Full question, answers, and visible comments concerning Consistency strength of projective Ramsey regularity; checked 2026-08-01."
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/76280/exact-consistency-strength-of-all-projective-sets-are-ramsey",
"locator": "Full question, answers, and visible comments concerning Consistency strength of projective Ramsey regularity; checked 2026-08-01."
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1356",
"title": "Current checked status and unresolved remainder",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "supersedes",
"direction": "outgoing",
"metadata": {
"reason": "Replaces unreadable status prose with the dated review from 2026-08-01."
}
},
{
"slug": "projective-sets-ramsey-consistency-strength",
"title": "projective sets ramsey consistency strength",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.