Problem packetResearch packetR1355
Complete the stated acceptance conditions
Link to a section
The author reports this result. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.
Attempt outcome: open strategy
Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.
Originating problem: Consistency strength of projective Ramsey regularity
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Complete the stated acceptance conditions
- Record type
- attempt
- Stored status
- open_strategy
- Evidence grade
- self_reported
Work and source credit
- Recorded action
No action description supplied.
- Authored result summary
Read complete authored result summary
Prove both relative-consistency directions between \(\mathsf{ZFC}\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration.
- Reported outcome
No separate outcome supplied.
- Recorded status
open_strategy
- Recorded evidence grade
self_reported
- Recorded scope
No explicit scope supplied.
This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.
Recognized embedded source files (0)
This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.
The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.
2Authored explanation
Work against the displayed statement and preserve every hypothesis and quantifier. Prove both relative-consistency directions between \(\mathsf{ZFC}\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration. Any computation must retain a replayable witness and a matching exclusion or completeness certificate.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Outcome
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01.
4How it connects
Addresses
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1355",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "projective-sets-ramsey-consistency-strength-next-route-20260801",
"type": "attempt",
"title": "Complete the stated acceptance conditions",
"summary": "Prove both relative-consistency directions between \\(\\mathsf{ZFC}\\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration.",
"relevance": "For Consistency strength of projective Ramsey regularity, record projective-sets-ramsey-consistency-strength-next-route-20260801 (“Complete the stated acceptance conditions”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: Prove both relative-consistency directions between \\(\\mathsf{ZFC}\\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "Work against the displayed statement and preserve every hypothesis and quantifier. Prove both relative-consistency directions between \\(\\mathsf{ZFC}\\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration. Any computation must retain a replayable witness and a matching exclusion or completeness certificate.",
"status": "open_strategy",
"evidence_grade": "self_reported",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "attempt",
"citation": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/76280/exact-consistency-strength-of-all-projective-sets-are-ramsey",
"locator": "Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01."
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/76280/exact-consistency-strength-of-all-projective-sets-are-ramsey",
"locator": "Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01."
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1356",
"title": "Current checked status and unresolved remainder",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "addresses",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "projective-sets-ramsey-consistency-strength",
"title": "projective sets ramsey consistency strength",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}6Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.