TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR597

R597Sourced evidence

Existence at order 12 remains open

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

The literature and catalogue audit found no accepted construction or complete exclusion for a projective plane of order 12.

The record cites sources for its explanation.

Recorded status: open

Recorded scope: existence of a finite projective plane of order 12, equivalently a symmetric 2-(157,13,1) design

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "bounded",
  "statement": "existence of a finite projective plane of order 12, equivalently a symmetric 2-(157,13,1) design",
  "bounds": {
    "order": {
      "min": 12,
      "max": 12
    },
    "points": {
      "min": 157,
      "max": 157
    },
    "lines": {
      "min": 157,
      "max": 157
    }
  },
  "exhaustive": false
}

Originating problem: A projective plane of order 12

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Existence at order 12 remains open
Record type
claim
Stored status
open
Evidence grade
sourced
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "bounded", "statement": "existence of a finite projective plane of order 12, equivalently a symmetric 2-(157,13,1) design", "bounds": { "order": { "min": 12, "max": 12 }, "points": { "min": 157, "max": 157 }, "lines": { "min": 157, "max": 157 } }, "exhaustive": false }

2Authored explanation

A projective plane of order 12 would have 157 points and 157 lines. Every line would contain 13 points, every point would lie on 13 lines, and each pair of points would determine one line. Equivalently, it would be a symmetric \(2\text{-}(157,13,1)\) design.

Akiyama, Suetake, and Tanaka state in their 2019 primary paper that the order-12 existence question is still unknown. Their exhaustive computation excludes collineation groups of order 9. Their 2023 sequel sharpens the symmetry restriction to collineation-group orders 1, 2, or 3 while leaving the plane itself unresolved. Kharaghani and Suda give a 2023 equivalence with a balancedly multi-splittable quaternary Hadamard matrix of order 144, which supplies another exact target rather than a resolution.

The research check through 2026-07-25 found no later accepted construction or nonexistence theorem. The answer recorded here is therefore open.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: ajc.maths.uq.edu.au ↗, Kenzi Akiyama, Chihiro Suetake, and Masaki Tanaka, The nonexistence of projective planes of order 12 with a collineation group of order 9, Australasian Journal of Combinatorics 74(1) (2019), 112-160, Introduction and main theorem; status cross-checked against the 2023 sources listed in metadata

4What was measured

Design parameters

v157b157r13k13lambda1

5How it connects

Constrained by

Reformulated by

Supported by

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R597",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "pp12-claim-open-status",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Existence at order 12 remains open",
  "summary": "The literature and catalogue audit found no accepted construction or complete exclusion for a projective plane of order 12.",
  "relevance": "For A projective plane of order 12, record pp12-claim-open-status (“Existence at order 12 remains open”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: The literature and catalogue audit found no accepted construction or complete exclusion for a projective plane of order 12.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "A projective plane of order 12 would have 157 points and 157 lines. Every line would contain 13 points, every point would lie on 13 lines, and each pair of points would determine one line. Equivalently, it would be a symmetric \\(2\\text{-}(157,13,1)\\) design.\n\nAkiyama, Suetake, and Tanaka state in their 2019 primary paper that the order-12 existence question is still unknown. Their exhaustive computation excludes collineation groups of order 9. Their 2023 sequel sharpens the symmetry restriction to collineation-group orders 1, 2, or 3 while leaving the plane itself unresolved. Kharaghani and Suda give a 2023 equivalence with a balancedly multi-splittable quaternary Hadamard matrix of order 144, which supplies another exact target rather than a resolution.\n\nThe research check through 2026-07-25 found no later accepted construction or nonexistence theorem. The answer recorded here is therefore open.",
  "status": "open",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "bounded",
    "statement": "existence of a finite projective plane of order 12, equivalently a symmetric 2-(157,13,1) design",
    "bounds": {
      "order": {
        "min": 12,
        "max": 12
      },
      "points": {
        "min": 157,
        "max": 157
      },
      "lines": {
        "min": 157,
        "max": 157
      }
    },
    "exhaustive": false
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://ajc.maths.uq.edu.au/pdf/74/ajc_v74_p112.pdf",
      "locator": "Kenzi Akiyama, Chihiro Suetake, and Masaki Tanaka, The nonexistence of projective planes of order 12 with a collineation group of order 9, Australasian Journal of Combinatorics 74(1) (2019), 112-160, Introduction and main theorem; status cross-checked against the 2023 sources listed in metadata"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://ajc.maths.uq.edu.au/pdf/74/ajc_v74_p112.pdf",
    "locator": "Kenzi Akiyama, Chihiro Suetake, and Masaki Tanaka, The nonexistence of projective planes of order 12 with a collineation group of order 9, Australasian Journal of Combinatorics 74(1) (2019), 112-160, Introduction and main theorem; status cross-checked against the 2023 sources listed in metadata"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R594",
      "title": "Bruck-Ryser gives no obstruction at order 12",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R595",
      "title": "Every collineation group has order 1, 2, or 3",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "constrains",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R596",
      "title": "Five order-12 MOLS are constructed, while eleven would settle the problem",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R592",
      "title": "Exact OA and 11-MOLS computational formulation",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "reformulates",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R593",
      "title": "Primary literature and small-plane catalogue audit",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "projective-plane-order-12",
      "title": "projective plane order 12",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.