Problem packetResearch packetR1698
Dated source and duplicate audit
Link to a section
The record cites sources for its explanation. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.
Attempt outcome: completed
Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.
Originating problem: Hot spots conjecture for convex planar domains
Recorded relationships: Current status and exact unresolved remainder
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Dated source and duplicate audit
- Record type
- attempt
- Stored status
- completed
- Evidence grade
- sourced
- Linked research record IDs
- R1701
Work and source credit
- Recorded action
No action description supplied.
- Authored result summary
Read complete authored result summary
The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: Many planar classes are proved; convex counterexamples now exist in sufficiently high dimension. Unresolved remainder: No convex planar counterexample or general proof was located.
- Reported outcome
No separate outcome supplied.
- Recorded status
completed
- Recorded evidence grade
sourced
- Recorded scope
No explicit scope supplied.
This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.
Recognized embedded source files (0)
This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.
The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.
2Authored explanation
The audit ran on 2026-08-01 across the cited primary literature and problem collections, Crossref, arXiv, and stable publisher records, TheoremDB published, prospecting, packet, formal, and retired corpus. It checked the exact statement, its named or normalized variants, recent status evidence, and the controlled TheoremDB corpus.
Queries included: - convex planar hot spots conjecture open 2026 - first Neumann eigenfunction convex domain interior maximum dimension two
The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: Many planar classes are proved; convex counterexamples now exist in sufficiently high dimension. Unresolved remainder: No convex planar counterexample or general proof was located.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Outcome
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, Lawford Hatcher, “The hot spots conjecture for some non-convex polygons,” arXiv:2405.19508v3. introduction and main theorems
4How it connects
Evidence for
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1698",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "planar-convex-hot-spots-attempt-dated-source-audit",
"type": "attempt",
"title": "Dated source and duplicate audit",
"summary": "The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: Many planar classes are proved; convex counterexamples now exist in sufficiently high dimension. Unresolved remainder: No convex planar counterexample or general proof was located.",
"relevance": "Documents why Hot spots conjecture for convex planar domains was treated as a distinct open target on 2026-08-01.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "The audit ran on 2026-08-01 across the cited primary literature and problem collections, Crossref, arXiv, and stable publisher records, TheoremDB published, prospecting, packet, formal, and retired corpus. It checked the exact statement, its named or normalized variants, recent status evidence, and the controlled TheoremDB corpus.\n\nQueries included:\n- convex planar hot spots conjecture open 2026\n- first Neumann eigenfunction convex domain interior maximum dimension two\n\nThe exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: Many planar classes are proved; convex counterexamples now exist in sufficiently high dimension. Unresolved remainder: No convex planar counterexample or general proof was located.",
"status": "completed",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "attempt",
"citation": {
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19508",
"locator": "Lawford Hatcher, “The hot spots conjecture for some non-convex polygons,” arXiv:2405.19508v3. introduction and main theorems"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19508",
"locator": "Lawford Hatcher, “The hot spots conjecture for some non-convex polygons,” arXiv:2405.19508v3. introduction and main theorems"
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1701",
"title": "Current status and exact unresolved remainder",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "evidences",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "planar-convex-hot-spots",
"title": "planar convex hot spots",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}6Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.