TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR159

R159Computational evidence

The candidate odd threshold is n(n-1)/2

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

Exact search proves the formula through n=19; a general matching lower bound remains open in this record.

The record reports a computation within its stated scope.

Recorded status: supported

Recorded scope: the reset threshold of A_n for every odd integer n at least 3

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "universal",
  "statement": "the reset threshold of A_n for every odd integer n at least 3"
}

Originating problem: Reset threshold of the cyclic pair-compression automaton

Authored record and scope
Authored title
The candidate odd threshold is n(n-1)/2
Record type
claim
Stored status
supported
Evidence grade
computational
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "universal", "statement": "the reset threshold of A_n for every odd integer n at least 3" }

2Authored explanation

The construction in cpcrt-claim-odd-reset-upper-bound proves \(\operatorname{rt}(A_n)\leq n(n-1)/2\) for every odd \(n\). A general fiber argument gives the rigorous lower bound \(\operatorname{rt}(A_n)\geq\lceil\log_2 n\rceil\): the letter \(a\) is a permutation, every fiber of \(b\) has size at most two, and a word containing \(k\) copies of \(b\) has fibers of size at most \(2^k\). A reset word has a fiber of size \(n\). Exact breadth-first search gives equality with the quadratic upper bound at every odd \(n\leq19\). Separately weighted searches find that every reset word in this tested range uses at least \(n-1\) copies of \(b\) and at least \((n-1)(n-2)/2\) copies of \(a\). These two sharper inequalities would prove the formula in general, but this record does not supply a universal proof of them.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: doi.org ↗, Exact subset-automaton checks through n=19 in cpcrt-artifact-exact-sweep; general upper bound and fiber lower bound proved in this record

4How it connects

Supported by

Informed by

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R159",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "cpcrt-claim-exact-classification",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "The candidate odd threshold is n(n-1)/2",
  "summary": "Exact search proves the formula through n=19; a general matching lower bound remains open in this record.",
  "relevance": "For Reset threshold of the cyclic pair-compression automaton, record cpcrt-claim-exact-classification (“The candidate odd threshold is n(n-1)/2”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: Exact search proves the formula through n=19; a general matching lower bound remains open in this record.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The construction in cpcrt-claim-odd-reset-upper-bound proves \\(\\operatorname{rt}(A_n)\\leq n(n-1)/2\\) for every odd \\(n\\). A general fiber argument gives the rigorous lower bound \\(\\operatorname{rt}(A_n)\\geq\\lceil\\log_2 n\\rceil\\): the letter \\(a\\) is a permutation, every fiber of \\(b\\) has size at most two, and a word containing \\(k\\) copies of \\(b\\) has fibers of size at most \\(2^k\\). A reset word has a fiber of size \\(n\\). Exact breadth-first search gives equality with the quadratic upper bound at every odd \\(n\\leq19\\). Separately weighted searches find that every reset word in this tested range uses at least \\(n-1\\) copies of \\(b\\) and at least \\((n-1)(n-2)/2\\) copies of \\(a\\). These two sharper inequalities would prove the formula in general, but this record does not supply a universal proof of them.",
  "status": "supported",
  "evidence_grade": "computational",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "universal",
    "statement": "the reset threshold of A_n for every odd integer n at least 3"
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.4213/rm10005e",
      "locator": "Exact subset-automaton checks through n=19 in cpcrt-artifact-exact-sweep; general upper bound and fiber lower bound proved in this record"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.4213/rm10005e",
    "locator": "Exact subset-automaton checks through n=19 in cpcrt-artifact-exact-sweep; general upper bound and fiber lower bound proved in this record"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R160",
      "title": "Every odd order has a quadratic reset word",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R156",
      "title": "Exact subset-automaton sweep and weighted lower checks",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "tests",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R157",
      "title": "Focused literature search found neighboring classes",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "cyclic-pair-compression-reset-threshold",
      "title": "cyclic pair compression reset threshold",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

6Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.