TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR57

R57Recorded attempt

The focused literature search found broader digit-sum results

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

Work on binary digit sums along arithmetic progressions supplies context, while the stated small-multiplier bound was not located.

The record cites sources for its explanation. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.

Attempt outcome: completed

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Sharp multipliers for balanced binary products

Authored record and scope
Authored title
The focused literature search found broader digit-sum results
Record type
attempt
Stored status
completed
Evidence grade
sourced

Work and source credit

Recorded action

No action description supplied.

Authored result summary

Work on binary digit sums along arithmetic progressions supplies context, while the stated small-multiplier bound was not located.

Reported outcome

No separate outcome supplied.

Recorded status

completed

Recorded evidence grade

sourced

Recorded scope

No explicit scope supplied.

This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.

Recognized embedded source files (0)

This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.

The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.

2Authored explanation

Spiegelhofer and Stoll study the binary sum-of-digits function \(s_2\) along arithmetic progressions. Their Theorem 1.1 proves full complexity, up to a shift, for finite tuples of digit-sum differences. Their elementary discussion also points out the carry difficulty introduced by multiplication by 3.

Focused searches for balanced binary multiples, prescribed binary weight in a residue class, and the exact bound \(2^{m-1}+1\) found no primary source stating this candidate. The cited paper concerns eventual digit-sum patterns and gives no multiplier of the required size. The novelty and universal status of the candidate remain unverified.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Outcome

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, Lukas Spiegelhofer and Thomas Stoll, The sum-of-digits function on arithmetic progressions, Theorem 1.1, Lemma 1.2, and the carry discussion in section 1

4How it connects

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R57",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "bbmb-attempt-literature-audit",
  "type": "attempt",
  "title": "The focused literature search found broader digit-sum results",
  "summary": "Work on binary digit sums along arithmetic progressions supplies context, while the stated small-multiplier bound was not located.",
  "relevance": "For Sharp multipliers for balanced binary products, record bbmb-attempt-literature-audit (“The focused literature search found broader digit-sum results”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: Work on binary digit sums along arithmetic progressions supplies context, while the stated small-multiplier bound was not located.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "Spiegelhofer and Stoll study the binary sum-of-digits function \\(s_2\\) along arithmetic progressions. Their Theorem 1.1 proves full complexity, up to a shift, for finite tuples of digit-sum differences. Their elementary discussion also points out the carry difficulty introduced by multiplication by 3.\n\nFocused searches for balanced binary multiples, prescribed binary weight in a residue class, and the exact bound \\(2^{m-1}+1\\) found no primary source stating this candidate. The cited paper concerns eventual digit-sum patterns and gives no multiplier of the required size. The novelty and universal status of the candidate remain unverified.",
  "status": "completed",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "attempt",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.08849",
      "locator": "Lukas Spiegelhofer and Thomas Stoll, The sum-of-digits function on arithmetic progressions, Theorem 1.1, Lemma 1.2, and the carry discussion in section 1"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.08849",
    "locator": "Lukas Spiegelhofer and Thomas Stoll, The sum-of-digits function on arithmetic progressions, Theorem 1.1, Lemma 1.2, and the carry discussion in section 1"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R56",
      "title": "A carry-free criterion reduces part of the search to popcounts",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "balanced-binary-multiplier-bound",
      "title": "balanced binary multiplier bound",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

6Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.