Problem packetResearch packetR1813
Asser's complement problem remains open
Link to a section
The record cites sources for its explanation.
Recorded status: reported
Recorded scope: first-order spectra over arbitrary finite relational vocabularies, with complementation inside the positive integers
Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
"kind": "universal",
"statement": "first-order spectra over arbitrary finite relational vocabularies, with complementation inside the positive integers"
}Originating problem: Asser's complement problem for first-order spectra
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Asser's complement problem remains open
- Record type
- claim
- Stored status
- reported
- Evidence grade
- sourced
- Recorded scope data
- { "kind": "universal", "statement": "first-order spectra over arbitrary finite relational vocabularies, with complementation inside the positive integers" }
2Authored explanation
A source and later-work search performed on 2026-07-28 found no proof or counterexample for the general complement question. Durand, Jones, Makowsky, and More state the problem as open and identify the complexity-theoretic equivalence \[ \mathrm{Spec}=\mathrm{coSpec}\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \mathrm{NE}=\mathrm{coNE}. \] Kopczyński and Tan prove that the full question can be reduced to first-order sentences with three variables and one symmetric binary relation, under the semantic restriction that every finite model is an undirected bipartite graph. Their earlier two-variable result gives a boundary on the other side: spectra of two-variable logic with counting are exactly the semilinear sets and are closed under complement.
The fixed finite unary-vocabulary calculation in this packet supplies a complete fragment result and an exact quantifier-rank cost. It leaves the three-variable binary-relation frontier untouched. The unresolved remainder is the full statement: construct a first-order spectrum for every complement, or prove that one complement is outside the class of first-order spectra.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: doi.org ↗, Kopczyński and Tan, Corollary 1.2, pp. 2 and 13–14
4What was measured
Live target
5How it connects
Replaces
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1813",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "asser-claim-current-status-reviewed-20260801",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Asser's complement problem remains open",
"summary": "Current sources leave closure of all first-order spectra under complement open. It is enough to settle three-variable sentences whose finite models are undirected bipartite graphs. The two-variable counting fragment is already closed.",
"relevance": "For Asser's complement problem for first-order spectra, record asser-claim-current-status (“Asser's complement problem remains open”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: Current sources leave closure of all first-order spectra under complement open.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "A source and later-work search performed on 2026-07-28 found no proof or counterexample for the general complement question. Durand, Jones, Makowsky, and More state the problem as open and identify the complexity-theoretic equivalence\n\\[\n\\mathrm{Spec}=\\mathrm{coSpec}\\quad\\Longleftrightarrow\\quad \\mathrm{NE}=\\mathrm{coNE}.\n\\]\nKopczyński and Tan prove that the full question can be reduced to first-order sentences with three variables and one symmetric binary relation, under the semantic restriction that every finite model is an undirected bipartite graph. Their earlier two-variable result gives a boundary on the other side: spectra of two-variable logic with counting are exactly the semilinear sets and are closed under complement.\n\nThe fixed finite unary-vocabulary calculation in this packet supplies a complete fragment result and an exact quantifier-rank cost. It leaves the three-variable binary-relation frontier untouched. The unresolved remainder is the full statement: construct a first-order spectrum for every complement, or prove that one complement is outside the class of first-order spectra.",
"status": "reported",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": {
"kind": "universal",
"statement": "first-order spectra over arbitrary finite relational vocabularies, with complementation inside the positive integers"
},
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-14(2:4)2018",
"locator": "Kopczyński and Tan, Corollary 1.2, pp. 2 and 13–14"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-14(2:4)2018",
"locator": "Kopczyński and Tan, Corollary 1.2, pp. 2 and 13–14"
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R38",
"title": "Asser's complement problem remains open",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "supersedes",
"direction": "outgoing",
"metadata": {
"reason": "Preserves the published record identity while attaching the independently reviewed release-300 bibliography."
}
},
{
"slug": "first-order-spectra-complement-closure",
"title": "first order spectra complement closure",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.