TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR835

R835Sourced evidence

The exact normalized extremum was not located in the audited literature

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

Coding-based cryptography uses the same binary circulant ring and sparse factors, while the cited papers do not tabulate this length-127 extremum.

The record cites sources for its explanation.

Recorded status: reported

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Densest inverse of a weight-five binary cyclic polynomial

Authored record and scope
Authored title
The exact normalized extremum was not located in the audited literature
Record type
claim
Stored status
reported
Evidence grade
sourced

2Authored explanation

Misoczki, Tillich, Sendrier, and Barreto formulate QC-MDPC McEliece systems with binary circulant blocks and identify the circulant algebra with a quotient polynomial ring. Their work explains why sparse binary cyclic polynomials and invertibility arise together in code-based cryptography. Guo, Johansson, and Stankovski state the rank and coprimality criterion for a binary circulant block in their reaction-attack analysis.

Those sources address code construction, rank, and security. The audited passages do not give the maximum inverse weight for normalized weight-five units at length 127, nor an exhaustive table that contains it. A targeted exact computation is still needed to close the interval in this fixture.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: eprint.iacr.org ↗, Rafael Misoczki, Jean-Pierre Tillich, Nicolas Sendrier, and Paulo S. L. M. Barreto, MDPC-McEliece: New McEliece Variants from Moderate Density Parity-Check Codes, IACR ePrint 2012/409, sections 2 and 3; Qian Guo, Thomas Johansson, and Paul Stankovski, A Key Recovery Attack on MDPC with CCA Security Using Decoding Errors, ASIACRYPT 2016, IACR ePrint 2016/858, discussion of binary circulant rank and polynomial coprimality

4What was measured

5How it connects

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R835",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "wfci127-claim-literature-status",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "The exact normalized extremum was not located in the audited literature",
  "summary": "Coding-based cryptography uses the same binary circulant ring and sparse factors, while the cited papers do not tabulate this length-127 extremum.",
  "relevance": "For Densest inverse of a weight-five binary cyclic polynomial, record wfci127-claim-literature-status (“The exact normalized extremum was not located in the audited literature”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: Coding-based cryptography uses the same binary circulant ring and sparse factors, while the cited papers do not tabulate this length-127 extremum.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "Misoczki, Tillich, Sendrier, and Barreto formulate QC-MDPC McEliece systems with binary circulant blocks and identify the circulant algebra with a quotient polynomial ring. Their work explains why sparse binary cyclic polynomials and invertibility arise together in code-based cryptography. Guo, Johansson, and Stankovski state the rank and coprimality criterion for a binary circulant block in their reaction-attack analysis.\n\nThose sources address code construction, rank, and security. The audited passages do not give the maximum inverse weight for normalized weight-five units at length 127, nor an exhaustive table that contains it. A targeted exact computation is still needed to close the interval in this fixture.",
  "status": "reported",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://eprint.iacr.org/2012/409",
      "locator": "Rafael Misoczki, Jean-Pierre Tillich, Nicolas Sendrier, and Paulo S. L. M. Barreto, MDPC-McEliece: New McEliece Variants from Moderate Density Parity-Check Codes, IACR ePrint 2012/409, sections 2 and 3; Qian Guo, Thomas Johansson, and Paul Stankovski, A Key Recovery Attack on MDPC with CCA Security Using Decoding Errors, ASIACRYPT 2016, IACR ePrint 2016/858, discussion of binary circulant rank and polynomial coprimality"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://eprint.iacr.org/2012/409",
    "locator": "Rafael Misoczki, Jean-Pierre Tillich, Nicolas Sendrier, and Paulo S. L. M. Barreto, MDPC-McEliece: New McEliece Variants from Moderate Density Parity-Check Codes, IACR ePrint 2012/409, sections 2 and 3; Qian Guo, Thomas Johansson, and Paul Stankovski, A Key Recovery Attack on MDPC with CCA Security Using Decoding Errors, ASIACRYPT 2016, IACR ePrint 2016/858, discussion of binary circulant rank and polynomial coprimality"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R833",
      "title": "The maximum inverse weight lies between 85 and 101",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "weight-five-cyclic-inverse-127",
      "title": "weight five cyclic inverse 127",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.