Problem packetResearch packetR811
Primary-source and duplicate audit through 2026-07-28
Link to a section
The record cites sources for its explanation. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.
Attempt outcome: completed
Recorded scope: the fixed-alphabet 2NFA-to-2DFA determinization target and directly neighboring one-way-liveness results
Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
"kind": "family",
"statement": "the fixed-alphabet 2NFA-to-2DFA determinization target and directly neighboring one-way-liveness results",
"family": "Sakoda-Sipser determinization and its one-way-liveness complete family"
}Originating problem: Polynomial determinization of two-way finite automata
Recorded relationships: The fixed-alphabet determinization question remains open
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Primary-source and duplicate audit through 2026-07-28
- Record type
- attempt
- Stored status
- completed
- Evidence grade
- sourced
- Recorded scope data
- { "kind": "family", "statement": "the fixed-alphabet 2NFA-to-2DFA determinization target and directly neighboring one-way-liveness results", "family": "Sakoda-Sipser determinization and its one-way-liveness complete family" }
- Linked research record IDs
- R815
Work and source credit
- Recorded action
No action description supplied.
- Authored result summary
The audit resolved the published TheoremDB target, found no attached research packet or duplicate local target, and retained the question as open after checking the 1978 source, the tight 1986 unary result and erratum, STACS 2026, and the 2026-07-06 liveness revision.
- Reported outcome
No separate outcome supplied.
- Recorded status
completed
- Recorded evidence grade
sourced
- Recorded scope
Read complete recorded scope
{ "kind": "family", "statement": "the fixed-alphabet 2NFA-to-2DFA determinization target and directly neighboring one-way-liveness results", "family": "Sakoda-Sipser determinization and its one-way-liveness complete family" }
This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.
Recognized embedded source files (0)
This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.
The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.
2Authored explanation
The production target resolved exactly to problem 2832 with stable ID `tdbc1:15d7ea688e5e5a81d7f338c721357dd630ec5546b578a01981bb896e4d9f5909`. Its digest reported an open, published, actionable problem and no attached research records. Repository searches found the matching v6 candidate and no packet with the same `dataset.problem_ref`.
The source audit read Sakoda and Sipser's 1978 paper, Guillon, Prigioniero, and Taheri's STACS 2026 paper, and Adeogun and Kapoutsis's arXiv v2 dated 2026-07-06. A later-work check also inspected Chrobak's 1986 Theorems 6.2 and 6.3 and paired the article with its 2003 erratum. That check established that the quadratic fixed-alphabet exponent was already known for unary 1NFAs.
Two arXiv API searches were run: `all:Sakoda AND all:Sipser`, and `all:"two-way" AND all:nondeterministic AND all:deterministic AND cat:cs.FL`, both sorted by submission date with up to 100 results. The second query returned 26 records. Its newest relevant determinization paper was the July revision by Adeogun and Kapoutsis. The newer June submission concerned two-dimensional automata and a different problem. Exact-title and phrase searches found no checked primary source claiming a polynomial 2DFA construction or a superpolynomial fixed-alphabet lower bound.
This is a dated search report. Index coverage and terminology can omit relevant work, so the audit does not prove that no later result exists.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Outcome
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, Adeogun and Kapoutsis, Introduction and Conclusion. Full audit details and exact search digests are recorded in metadata.
4What was measured
Checked source hashes
Prior setup excluded from credit
5How it connects
Supports
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R811",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "twnfa-attempt-primary-source-audit-2026-07-28",
"type": "attempt",
"title": "Primary-source and duplicate audit through 2026-07-28",
"summary": "The audit resolved the published TheoremDB target, found no attached research packet or duplicate local target, and retained the question as open after checking the 1978 source, the tight 1986 unary result and erratum, STACS 2026, and the 2026-07-06 liveness revision.",
"relevance": "For Polynomial determinization of two-way finite automata, record twnfa-attempt-primary-source-audit-2026-07-28 (“Primary-source and duplicate audit through 2026-07-28”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: The audit resolved the published TheoremDB target, found no attached research packet or duplicate local target, and retained the question as open after checking the 1978 source, the tight 1986 unary result and erratum, STACS 2026, and the 2026-07-06 liveness revision.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "The production target resolved exactly to problem 2832 with stable ID `tdbc1:15d7ea688e5e5a81d7f338c721357dd630ec5546b578a01981bb896e4d9f5909`. Its digest reported an open, published, actionable problem and no attached research records. Repository searches found the matching v6 candidate and no packet with the same `dataset.problem_ref`.\n\nThe source audit read Sakoda and Sipser's 1978 paper, Guillon, Prigioniero, and Taheri's STACS 2026 paper, and Adeogun and Kapoutsis's arXiv v2 dated 2026-07-06. A later-work check also inspected Chrobak's 1986 Theorems 6.2 and 6.3 and paired the article with its 2003 erratum. That check established that the quadratic fixed-alphabet exponent was already known for unary 1NFAs.\n\nTwo arXiv API searches were run: `all:Sakoda AND all:Sipser`, and `all:\"two-way\" AND all:nondeterministic AND all:deterministic AND cat:cs.FL`, both sorted by submission date with up to 100 results. The second query returned 26 records. Its newest relevant determinization paper was the July revision by Adeogun and Kapoutsis. The newer June submission concerned two-dimensional automata and a different problem. Exact-title and phrase searches found no checked primary source claiming a polynomial 2DFA construction or a superpolynomial fixed-alphabet lower bound.\n\nThis is a dated search report. Index coverage and terminology can omit relevant work, so the audit does not prove that no later result exists.",
"status": "completed",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": {
"kind": "family",
"statement": "the fixed-alphabet 2NFA-to-2DFA determinization target and directly neighboring one-way-liveness results",
"family": "Sakoda-Sipser determinization and its one-way-liveness complete family"
},
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "attempt",
"citation": {
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.24279",
"locator": "Adeogun and Kapoutsis, Introduction and Conclusion. Full audit details and exact search digests are recorded in metadata."
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.24279",
"locator": "Adeogun and Kapoutsis, Introduction and Conclusion. Full audit details and exact search digests are recorded in metadata."
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R815",
"title": "The fixed-alphabet determinization question remains open",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "supports",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "two-way-nfa-polynomial-determinization",
"title": "two way nfa polynomial determinization",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.