Problem packetResearch packetR663
An eight-term cubic has exact second-order nonlinearity 88
Link to a section
The record reports a computation within its stated scope.
Recorded status: supported
Recorded scope: one displayed 8-variable cubic against every degree-at-most-two Boolean correction
Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
"kind": "bounded",
"statement": "one displayed 8-variable cubic against every degree-at-most-two Boolean correction",
"bounds": {
"variables": {
"min": 8,
"max": 8
},
"correction_degree": {
"min": 0,
"max": 2
},
"witness_count": {
"min": 1,
"max": 1
},
"quotient_representatives": {
"min": 8192,
"max": 8192
}
},
"exhaustive": true
}Originating problem: Covering radius of the second-order Reed-Muller code RM(2,8)
Recorded relationships: The full covering radius satisfies 88 <= rho(2,8) <= 96
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- An eight-term cubic has exact second-order nonlinearity 88
- Record type
- claim
- Stored status
- supported
- Evidence grade
- computational
- Recorded scope data
- { "kind": "bounded", "statement": "one displayed 8-variable cubic against every degree-at-most-two Boolean correction", "bounds": { "variables": { "min": 8, "max": 8 }, "correction_degree": { "min": 0, "max": 2 }, "witness_count": { "min": 1, "max": 1 }, "quotient_representatives": { "min": 8192, "max": 8192 } }, "exhaustive": true }
- Linked research record IDs
- R662
2Authored explanation
Brier and Langevin record the following cubic; this packet checks its distance independently. Use variables \(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h\), and set \[ F=abc+adg+afh+agh+bdh+beg+ceh+def. \] Split on \(a\). With \(y=(b,c,d,e,f,g,h)\), write \(F=G(y)+aP(y)\), where \[ G=bdh+beg+ceh+def,\qquad P=bc+dg+fh+gh. \] Every quadratic correction has the form \(H(y)+A_0(y)+aA_1(y)\), where \(H\) is homogeneous quadratic and \(A_0,A_1\) are affine. The two affine corrections can therefore be optimized independently on the slices. If \(H\) ranges over the 21-dimensional space of homogeneous quadratics in seven variables, this gives \[ d_2(F)=\min_H\bigl(d_1(G+H)+d_1(G+P+H)\bigr). \] Shifting \(H\) by \(P\) swaps the two summands. Translating a coordinate of \(y\) shifts \(G\) by its coordinate derivative and shifts each quadratic by an affine function, which leaves \(d_1\) unchanged. Thus the pair score is invariant under \(P\) and the seven coordinate derivatives of \(G\). These eight quadratics are independent, leaving a quotient of dimension 13. Exhaustive Walsh-transform evaluation of its 8,192 representatives gives the score histogram \[ \begin{array}{c|rrrrrrr} \text{score}&88&92&96&100&104&108&112\\ \text{count}&28&1016&2968&3024&1092&56&8. \end{array} \] The minimum is 88. The quadratic \(Q=ad+bc+bd+bg\) gives \(\operatorname{wt}(F+Q)=88\) directly, with slice weights 40 and 48. The replay also fixes the truth-table ordering and checks both table digests.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: Exact derivation and exhaustive inline replay in rm28-artifact-exact-cubic-distance
4What was measured
Execution
Published source
5How it connects
Evidenced by
- artifact
- artifact
Supports
- claim
Reports (incoming)
- attempt
Attempted by
- attempt
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R663",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "rm28-claim-cubic-witness-distance-88",
"type": "claim",
"title": "An eight-term cubic has exact second-order nonlinearity 88",
"summary": "The cubic f=abc+adg+afh+agh+bdh+beg+ceh+def has minimum distance exactly 88 from every 8-variable Boolean polynomial of degree at most two.",
"relevance": "For Covering radius of the second-order Reed-Muller code RM(2,8), record rm28-claim-cubic-witness-distance-88 (“An eight-term cubic has exact second-order nonlinearity 88”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: The cubic f=abc+adg+afh+agh+bdh+beg+ceh+def has minimum distance exactly 88 from every 8-variable Boolean polynomial of degree at most two.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "Brier and Langevin record the following cubic; this packet checks its distance independently. Use variables \\(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h\\), and set\n\\[\nF=abc+adg+afh+agh+bdh+beg+ceh+def.\n\\]\nSplit on \\(a\\). With \\(y=(b,c,d,e,f,g,h)\\), write \\(F=G(y)+aP(y)\\), where\n\\[\nG=bdh+beg+ceh+def,\\qquad P=bc+dg+fh+gh.\n\\]\nEvery quadratic correction has the form \\(H(y)+A_0(y)+aA_1(y)\\), where \\(H\\) is homogeneous quadratic and \\(A_0,A_1\\) are affine. The two affine corrections can therefore be optimized independently on the slices. If \\(H\\) ranges over the 21-dimensional space of homogeneous quadratics in seven variables, this gives\n\\[\nd_2(F)=\\min_H\\bigl(d_1(G+H)+d_1(G+P+H)\\bigr).\n\\]\nShifting \\(H\\) by \\(P\\) swaps the two summands. Translating a coordinate of \\(y\\) shifts \\(G\\) by its coordinate derivative and shifts each quadratic by an affine function, which leaves \\(d_1\\) unchanged. Thus the pair score is invariant under \\(P\\) and the seven coordinate derivatives of \\(G\\). These eight quadratics are independent, leaving a quotient of dimension 13. Exhaustive Walsh-transform evaluation of its 8,192 representatives gives the score histogram\n\\[\n\\begin{array}{c|rrrrrrr}\n\\text{score}&88&92&96&100&104&108&112\\\\\n\\text{count}&28&1016&2968&3024&1092&56&8.\n\\end{array}\n\\]\nThe minimum is 88. The quadratic \\(Q=ad+bc+bd+bg\\) gives \\(\\operatorname{wt}(F+Q)=88\\) directly, with slice weights 40 and 48. The replay also fixes the truth-table ordering and checks both table digests.",
"status": "supported",
"evidence_grade": "computational",
"scope": {
"kind": "bounded",
"statement": "one displayed 8-variable cubic against every degree-at-most-two Boolean correction",
"bounds": {
"variables": {
"min": 8,
"max": 8
},
"correction_degree": {
"min": 0,
"max": 2
},
"witness_count": {
"min": 1,
"max": 1
},
"quotient_representatives": {
"min": 8192,
"max": 8192
}
},
"exhaustive": true
},
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"locator": "Exact derivation and exhaustive inline replay in rm28-artifact-exact-cubic-distance"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": null,
"locator": "Exact derivation and exhaustive inline replay in rm28-artifact-exact-cubic-distance"
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R657",
"title": "Exact quotient and Walsh replay for the distance-88 cubic",
"object_type": "artifact",
"relation": "evidences",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R658",
"title": "Full 2^21-quadratic C cross-check of the cubic distance",
"object_type": "artifact",
"relation": "evidences",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R662",
"title": "The full covering radius satisfies 88 <= rho(2,8) <= 96",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "supports",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "R660",
"title": "A 2026-07-28 source audit confirms the current 88 to 96 interval",
"object_type": "attempt",
"relation": "reports",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R661",
"title": "A monolithic Z3 distance minimization timed out",
"object_type": "attempt",
"relation": "attempts",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "reed-muller-rm2-8-covering-radius",
"title": "reed muller rm2 8 covering radius",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.