TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR290

R290Self-reported evidence

Residual cores appear on Zeckendorf-sparse symmetric index sets

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

The peeled core retains the same Fibonacci-sum entry rule on a sparse, symmetric subset of row and column indices.

The author reports this result.

Recorded status: observed

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Determinants of the Fibonacci-sum matrix

Recorded relationships: Close a recursion on the peeled core

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Residual cores appear on Zeckendorf-sparse symmetric index sets
Record type
claim
Stored status
observed
Evidence grade
self_reported
Linked research record IDs
R271

2Authored explanation

A precise index map could turn the core reduction into an induction or renormalization argument.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, theoremdb frontier pilot record

4How it connects

Supports

Supported by

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R290",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "fib-claim-core-zeckendorf-sparse",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Residual cores appear on Zeckendorf-sparse symmetric index sets",
  "summary": "The peeled core retains the same Fibonacci-sum entry rule on a sparse, symmetric subset of row and column indices.",
  "relevance": "For fib problem determinant range; fib problem nonzero support, record fib-claim-core-zeckendorf-sparse (“Residual cores appear on Zeckendorf-sparse symmetric index sets”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: The peeled core retains the same Fibonacci-sum entry rule on a sparse, symmetric subset of row and column indices.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "A precise index map could turn the core reduction into an induction or renormalization argument.",
  "status": "observed",
  "evidence_grade": "self_reported",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/513340/is-the-determinant-of-this-fibonacci-sum-indicator-matrix-always-1-0-or/513372",
      "locator": "theoremdb frontier pilot record"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/513340/is-the-determinant-of-this-fibonacci-sum-indicator-matrix-always-1-0-or/513372",
    "locator": "theoremdb frontier pilot record"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R271",
      "title": "Close a recursion on the peeled core",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R259",
      "title": "Residual-core index samples",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R260",
      "title": "Residual-core index samples",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "incoming"
    }
  ]
}

6Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.