Problem packetResearch packetR1333
Complete the stated acceptance conditions
Link to a section
The author reports this result. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.
Attempt outcome: open strategy
Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.
Originating problem: Openness of convolution on l1 of the integers
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Complete the stated acceptance conditions
- Record type
- attempt
- Stored status
- open_strategy
- Evidence grade
- self_reported
Work and source credit
- Recorded action
No action description supplied.
- Authored result summary
Read complete authored result summary
Prove local openness at every pair (a,b), with a neighborhood estimate that may depend on the pair, or exhibit a pair and an explicit sequence converging to a*b that cannot be factored by pairs converging to (a,b). A negative result must rule out all nearby factorizations, rather than showing failure of a single constructive factorization method.
- Reported outcome
No separate outcome supplied.
- Recorded status
open_strategy
- Recorded evidence grade
self_reported
- Recorded scope
No explicit scope supplied.
This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.
Recognized embedded source files (0)
This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.
The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.
2Authored explanation
Work against the displayed statement and preserve every hypothesis and quantifier. Prove local openness at every pair (a,b), with a neighborhood estimate that may depend on the pair, or exhibit a pair and an explicit sequence converging to a*b that cannot be factored by pairs converging to (a,b). A negative result must rule out all nearby factorizations, rather than showing failure of a single constructive factorization method. Any computation must retain a replayable witness and a matching exclusion or completeness certificate.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Outcome
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01.
4How it connects
Addresses
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1333",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "l1z-convolution-open-map-next-route-20260801",
"type": "attempt",
"title": "Complete the stated acceptance conditions",
"summary": "Prove local openness at every pair (a,b), with a neighborhood estimate that may depend on the pair, or exhibit a pair and an explicit sequence converging to a*b that cannot be factored by pairs converging to (a,b). A negative result must rule out all nearby factorizations, rather than showing failure of a single constructive factorization method.",
"relevance": "For Openness of convolution on l1 of the integers, record l1z-convolution-open-map-next-route-20260801 (“Complete the stated acceptance conditions”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: Prove local openness at every pair (a,b), with a neighborhood estimate that may depend on the pair, or exhibit a pair and an explicit sequence converging to a*b that cannot be factored by pairs converging to (a,b).",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "Work against the displayed statement and preserve every hypothesis and quantifier. Prove local openness at every pair (a,b), with a neighborhood estimate that may depend on the pair, or exhibit a pair and an explicit sequence converging to a*b that cannot be factored by pairs converging to (a,b). A negative result must rule out all nearby factorizations, rather than showing failure of a single constructive factorization method. Any computation must retain a replayable witness and a matching exclusion or completeness certificate.",
"status": "open_strategy",
"evidence_grade": "self_reported",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "attempt",
"citation": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/504613/is-convolution-in-ell-1-mathbb-z-an-open-map",
"locator": "Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01."
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/504613/is-convolution-in-ell-1-mathbb-z-an-open-map",
"locator": "Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01."
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1334",
"title": "Current checked status and unresolved remainder",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "addresses",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "l1z-convolution-open-map",
"title": "l1z convolution open map",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}6Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.